Buy Out the Empire: Making an Offer He Can’t Refuse

(Taking Up) The Collection

An Exit Strategy for Trump 2, Year 2

Taking Up The Collection

The Collection is a collective action to disrupt and dethrone the Imperial Presidency by gamifying dissent and offering a massive, 24/7 “Exit Jackpot” to reclaim the American republic.

Deal Making as a Rite of Passage

As the presidency transitions from a public office to a luxury brand, the opposition must stop reacting and start negotiating. Welcome to “The Collection,” a high-stakes digital series that frames the “Imperial Presidency” as a distressed asset ripe for a corporate buyout.

This isn’t a fundraiser for television ads; it’s a live, 24/7 “Exit Jackpot” offered to the President in exchange for his immediate resignation. By contrasting “Royal Spend” pageantry with the systemic gutting of the American safety net, the show gamifies dissent. It transforms the public from passive victims into active shareholders, making an offer no “man of the deal” can ignore.


Speculative Repair List

To win, the opposition must control the narrative by treating “The Collection” as a high-stakes spectacle. This isn’t a standard fundraiser; it is a strategic “priming of the pump” designed to maximize both viewership and capital through collective action.

Trump will likely sense the trap. The Collection weaponizes ridicule, exposing his thinning skin while highlighting the massive national debt – the “Royal Spend” – accumulated under his watch. Unlike traditional protests, he cannot simply shout over this format. As he retaliates with legal threats and censorship, the opposition should double or triple matching funds, using his aggression to fuel the jackpot.

If his desire for vengeance leads him to suppress the event, that very interference should trigger the endgame: a final “Priority Vote” where the public instantly earmarks and distributes the funds.

How would that work?


Enter The Imperial Ledger

Pilot Episode 101: “The Cost of the Crown” | Date: Immediate Future

CUE 1: A high-contrast, “Late-Night Noir” aesthetic. The HOST stands before a massive digital screen – The Ledger – scrolling with gold-on-black text and ticker tape numbers.

HOST: Good evening, citizens. Welcome to the first edition of The Imperial Ledger, the only accounting firm authorized by the reality of your own bank accounts.

Since the Restoration began in January, we’ve been told we’re living through a “Golden Age.” But gold is heavy, and someone has to carry it. Tonight, we look at the balance sheet for the 47th Presidency as we closed out 2025.

CUE 2: A 3D rendering of the White House displays The East Wing highlighted in red, then dissolves into a pile of digital rubble.

White House East Wing demolished as Trump moves forward with ballroom construction, AP photos show, Darlene Superville; Jacquelyn Martin, Associated Press, October 23, 2025

HOST: Item one on the Ledger: The Demolition of History. In October, the President decided the East Wing – a fixture since 1902 – wasn’t “ballroom” enough. He tore it down. In its place, we’re getting a $400 million, 90,000-square-foot “State Ballroom.” It’s designed to hold 999 people – because 1,000 would be “ostentatious,” I’m sure. The White House calls it a “National Security” priority. Apparently, our primary defense against foreign threats is a really, really big dance floor for donors from BlackRock, Nvidia, Meta, Google, and Amazon.

Billionaires at Trump’s inauguration hold wealth equal to 1/3 India’s GDP, Vasudha Mukherjee, Business Standard, January 21, 2025

CUE 3: The Ledger scrolls to a list of names: “The Donald J. Trump and The John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts.”

HOST: Next, the Branding Fee. As of late December, the Kennedy Center is officially the “Trump-Kennedy Center.” Because nothing says “Performing Arts” like a hostile takeover by the Chairman of the Board. The new gold signage is still fresh. It’s the ultimate Participation Trophy: President Trump didn’t win a Grammy, so he just bought the building.

CUE 4: The Ledger shifts to the “Repair List” for the common man. Numbers start spinning rapidly.

Quiet Over Trump’s Kennedy Center Grab Risks Capitulation, Eleanor Clift, The Daily Beat, February 13, 2025

Three Repair Worthy Collections

Some viable candidate causes include:

A. The Nutritional Safety Net (Repairing Food Security)

The Fix: Funding “Community Granaries” in the 2,000+ counties most affected by inflation and benefit rollbacks.

With the administration’s proposed $300 billion in cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), an estimated 16 million children face reduced access to food.

HOST: But let’s look at the “One Big Beautiful Bill.” While you were busy getting your $25,000 tax deduction on tip income — if you’re lucky enough to make that much in tips…

#Impact AreaMeasurable Change & Outcome
1Medicaid Funding ChasmBans “provider taxes,” stripping states of $340 billion in revenue used to draw down federal Medicaid matches.
2SNAP Benefit ErosionCuts federal food assistance by $187 billion (20%), forcing a 30–50% surge in demand at local food banks.
3Admin Compliance SurgeForces states to build IT systems to track 80-hour/month work requirements for millions of Medicaid/SNAP recipients.
4State Revenue DrainAutomatic tax conformity is projected to slash state revenues by $100M to $1.2B per state (e.g., Colorado, Arizona).
5Healthcare Churn RisksCBO predicts 11.8 million people will lose coverage, increasing “uncompensated care” costs for providers by an estimated 15%.
6Work-for-Benefits MandateRequires 80 hours/month of work or community service for Medicaid/SNAP recipients (ages 19–64).
7Medicaid Cost SharingImplements co-payments of up to $35 per service for ACA expansion adults (income 100–138% of FPL).
8Graduate Loan CapsLimits federal borrowing for Master’s degrees to $20,500/year, forcing students to seek private loans for excess costs.
9SNAP Exemption RemovalSubjects 300,000+ veterans and formerly homeless individuals to the 3-month benefit time limit.
10Coverage Loss ForecastCBO projects 10.9 million people will lose health insurance by 2034 due to eligibility and subsidy changes.

That’s the trade: You get to deduct the interest on your new car loan, but your neighbor’s kid doesn’t get lunch. That’s the “Imperial” exchange rate. 

CUE: Proportion of Elon Musk’s stock options that would cover the SNAP shortfall…

Musk Wins $1 Trillion Pay Package, Creating Split Screen on Wealth in America, Rebecca F. Elliot; Jack Ewing; Reid J. Epstein, New York Times, November 6, 2025

B. Healthcare Restoration (Repairing the Safety Net)

After the only town hospital closed, a North Carolina city blames politicians: There’s no help for you here, Amanda Seitz; Allen G. Breed, The Independent, May 20, 2024

Current budget projections include a $1 trillion cut to Medicaid over the next decade. This is estimated to leave roughly 10 million to 11.8 million Americans uninsured.

The Fix: A “Mobile Health Corps” specifically for rural areas where 1 in 4 residents currently relies on Medicaid for primary care and birth coverage.

HOST: “Last month, 12 rural hospitals in the Midwest closed their doors due to the Medicaid ‘Efficiency Purge.’ Tonight, your Priority Vote can move $50 million of the Collection’s interest directly to these facilities. You have the power. You have the funds. Don’t just watch the empire rise. Fund the restoration. Take up the Collection.”

The Jackpot is growing. But while the President waits for the right number to step down, the clock is ticking for the rest of us.

CUE: Somber, black-and-white footage of a closed rural medical clinic. A small child sits on the steps. A countdown timer appears in the corner.


C. Small Business Tariffs Relief (Repairing the Bootstrap Work Ethic)

Trump’s First Year Back, in 10 Charts, Steven Rattner, New York Times, December 27, 2025

Recent trade barriers have hiked raw material costs by an average of 22%, leaving local manufacturers unable to compete with subsidized global giants. Projections suggest 15,000 small-town family businesses will shutter by year-end without immediate intervention. 

The Fix: Direct “Bridge-to-Build” grants for businesses hit by the “One Big Beautiful Bill” trade policies. Provide immediate liquidity and supply-chain pivoting funds for domestic businesses with fewer than 50 employees.

HOST: Which brings us to why we are here. The President knows he is bored by the price of housing. He’s not focused on the cost of healthcare. He’s above the concerns of the majority of Americans that come from more modest roots and less favorable gene pools. And he loves a deal. And we know he loves to move on when the price is right.

Trump Attacks Obamacare Without a Health Plan, Dean Baker, CEPR, October 6, 2025

CUE: The host points directly into the camera:

So, it’s time for the Final Collection. If the cost of his “reign” is too high for the Constitution, maybe it’s just low enough for a buyout. We are opening the “Self-Removal Fund.” A golden parachute so large, so beautiful, so massive that even he can’t say no to a private retirement in Mar-a-Lago permanently. 

Look at the Ledger. Look at the ballroom. Look at our neighbors. Then, look at your phone. Take up the Collection. Contribute to the Jackpot for his early exit. Let’s make him an offer he can’t refuse – before there’s nothing left of the People’s House but the gold leaf.”


Why “The Collection” Works Where Politics Fails

Conventional political channels – courts, legislation, and traditional protests – rely on norms that the current “Imperial Presidency” has already discarded. These methods are too slow, predictable, and easily ignored by a leader who controls the narrative through sheer media saturation.

“The Collection” succeeds by moving the battlefield from the ballot box to the balance sheet. By treating a President with a 36% approval rating as a “distressed asset,” it converts abstract frustration into a tangible, ever-growing Buyout Number to cap his insatiable temperment. This format strips the leader of his narrative dominance, relegating him to a mere contestant whose only move is to quit. It traps a “man of the deal” in his own branding, forcing him into defensive, damaging optics that traditional politics simply cannot achieve.


Heading Trump Off at the Institutional Standoff Corral

Institutional Capture: Legislative and judicial checks are increasingly slow or neutralized by executive overreach, making “legal” resistance feel like a theoretical exercise rather than a functional one.

The Attention Economy: Traditional protests are easily framed as “partisan noise.” “The Collection” uses a high-stakes, “Jackpot” format that the media cannot afford to ignore, forcing the administration to respond to the public’s terms.

The Language of the Deal: The current administration views the country through the lens of corporate ownership. By framing the presidency as a buyout opportunity, the opposition speaks the administration’s only fluent language, making the “Golden Parachute” a psychological trap that bypasses ideological gridlock.


Turning the Corner

By prioritizing personal grudges, Trump undermines his own leverage as a negotiator. His brand is no longer just threatened by his erratic behavior, but by something more damaging: predictability. This growing boredom may be exactly what allows America to regain its collective focus.

To succeed in 2026, the opposition must “flip the script” by choosing humor, consensus, and accessibility over the reactive whiplash that defined 2025. We cannot reverse history; we can only change how we move forward.

New World Order: Art of the Deal vs Art of War, Tang Meng Kit, Asia Times, April 30, 2025

The 2026 Deadline: Why Democrats Must Fix the Primaries Now

ABOVE:
Reddit: r/PoliticalCompass |
“My Prediction for the 2024 Democratic Primary.”

Democrats Must Reclaim the Primary Stage — Before It’s Too Late

August 11, 2020: The first and last time Biden reached out to Harris for acceptance.

Once upon a time, the primary season was a civic ritual — a scheduled airing of ideas, disagreements, and democratic sanity. It was a moment when political parties opened the floor to the people, inviting them to shape the future by choosing their next standard-bearer. But in 2024, that tradition was shattered.

Faced with the looming specter of another Trump presidency, Democratic leadership made a fateful decision: to close ranks, silence dissent, and rally behind President Biden without a contest. We were told the stakes were too high for debate. That democracy itself might not survive another Trump term. But in doing so, the party suspended the very democratic process it claimed to defend.

This wasn’t just a broken campaign promise. It was a breach of trust. A deliberate sidelining of voters who expected to vet their next nominee. What followed was a chaotic defense of the status quo, a strategy so brittle it cracked under pressure. And now, as we look to the post-Biden-Harris era, we see a leadership class —

  • Senate Leader Schumer,
  • House Leader Jeffries,
  • Justice Kagan, and yes,
  • Even #44 Obama…

— unwilling to confront the damage. They tinker at the edges while the opposition bulldozes institutions with Project 2025 as its blueprint. The blue wave of 2025 cannot be readily addressed as a precursor to the mid-terms of ‘26 without a reconciliation of the recent past.

Is it any wonder the party feels adrift? The ship is taking on water, and the captains are eyeing the lifeboats. Meanwhile, the rest of us — rank-and-file wilderness Democrats — are left wondering how to turn heads, let alone tides, in a post-MAGA America.

Let’s be clear: hashtags, disembodied texts, and ad buys won’t save us. As David Brooks recently noted:

“There are more human beings in America eager to be offended than there are those who are eager to offend.”

No More Small Donor-funded TV Ads

But what about those of us who are eager to act? We’re not just losing committee seats. We’re losing health care, food security, and for many, the basic freedom to move through this country without fear.

It’s time to stop licking our wounds and start speaking with purpose. And that begins by reclaiming the democratic process we were denied in 2024.

Let’s stage the primaries that never happened.

Imagine it: a 2026 Democratic Primary season that isn’t just a procedural warm-up, but a full-throated forum for the ideas, frustrations, and hopes of a fractured base. A signal to Democrats in red states that their voices matter and they’re not alone. A platform for grassroots energy that’s been ignored for too long. A public reckoning that the party in power — so allergic to dissent — can’t stomach.


Harris Walz spent $1.4 billion in ad spending in battleground states and lost all seven. Still want to pony up for the next merry-go-round?

The Work Ahead

Food Fights to Come

Will it be messy? Absolutely. Will it produce a tidy consensus? Not a chance. But it will be real. It will be democracy. And it will be ours:

  • A credible voice of opposition,
  • A democratic mechanism to amplify that voice, and
  • A spectacle of spirited debate that exposes the opposition’s disdain for actual debate and competitive races.

To my fellow civically-starved Democrats: shake off the timidity bred by weak leadership and performative outrage. We’ve grown tougher. The fight ahead demands less choreography and more courage. Less spin, more substance. Less fear, more fire.

Let’s light that fire in 2026. Let’s make the primaries a proving ground. Not just for candidates, but for the soul of our party. Let’s march through all 50 states with the energy of a movement that refuses to be silenced again.

The time for passive resistance is over. The time for (large D) Democratic revival is now.

No chances © Marc Solomon 2024