Why Hampshire? Why Now?

In mid‑October, 500 members of the Hampshire community gathered for a timely symposium on AI, authoritarianism, and Hampshire College, highlighting the college’s civic role. Filmmaker‑historian Ken Burns ’71F, AI researcher Gary Marcus ’86F, and AAC&U president Lynn Pasquerella P’08 laid out urgent challenges and practical responses. These notes distill the panel’s key insights and make the case that Hampshire’s experimental, community‑centered pedagogy is not grounds for nostalgia. It’s a call to action that models how higher education can help repair the fraying social contract between leaders, institutions, and citizens.

October 18, 2025:

Tending to our founding seeds

The Home Court Advantages of Immersive Education

The most empowering message was delivered by Ms. Pasquerella. It was the writ large reinsertion of the humanities into the desired skills in an AI-infested job market. Not only a self-evident observation, but an actual home court advantage for Team Hampshire. Understanding the motivations for change is a first-mover advantage for building a healthy tolerance for risk, and robust and disciplined experimentation. That kind of trial and error comes with the uncharted turf of a Hampshire degree. It’s that deeper connection to purpose that connects to internships, community service, work study, and field work.

Perhaps these are some of the reasons why the study abroad bandwagon is coming home to roost in the surrounding Pioneer Valley community. It’s the local impact of real world change that gives our farm center students a laboratory the size of the bountiful Connecticut River farm delta.

This kind of hands-on experience in climate adaptation and planting methods are a benefit that extends our body of academic work from curriculum to discovery to the benefits shared with Hampshire’s neighboring communities.

Hampshire’s small size and under-the-radar positioning is another advantage. Freed from the pressures of ranking‑driven branding and donor expectations that shape many A‑list colleges, it can iterate pedagogically, take curricular risks, and center marginalized voices without needing to conform to prestige metrics. Less visibility means more freedom to prototype education models, to fail fast, and to scale what works, producing innovations that larger institutions later adopt. In short, Hampshire preserves and advances the democratic promise of higher education–to cultivate independent thinkers who can invent new forms of knowledge and public service–precisely because it operates outside the spotlight and forces that constrain academic purpose.

AI Communications Skills: Conflict Resolution 101

As told by a deep fake: The counterpoint to faith is not doubt. It is uncertainty.

With AI, those softer skills of emotional intelligence, the resolution-seeking nature of conflict resolution are evolving into harder skills. Harder because the substitution of AI for companionship is the first in a steady succession of ill-advised uses of AI in the mid 2020s: a word probability parlor game now positioned as the cornerstone of the American economy. It will take the forceful presence of human agents to impress upon a distracted and shallow marketplace that the faking of relatedness doesn’t justify the harm posed by…

1. Extortion-friendly deep fakes 

2. Synthetic friendships, and

3. Fabricated term papers

As Mr. Marcus intimates, AI in its infancy deserves better responses than stuffing genies back in bottles or moving fast to break things.

One wish I do have for my future Hamsters is a warming to the idea of tolerance and not to see the world of ideas as either a shooting gallery or an excuse for retreats to safe spaces. Hampshire students are traditionally a questioning folk, sometimes bordering on obsessional. Why not take that unflinching curiosity to the next level? Why not reimagine an as-yet unformed social space that privileges emotional intelligence above moral crusading

Look at distrust in the face for its name is uncertainty. Commandeer what makes us so relentless and apply it to the hearing out of conflicting ideas. 

“Are you insane?” you’re thinking by now. A decidedly lefty school as a force for social moderation. A bulwark against the flagrant refusals of those in power to return the favor. Are you kidding me?

What’s truly transformative isn’t merely the act of changing our minds – or challenging those who unsettle us. It’s the moment our perspectives expand through genuine engagement with voices beyond our own lived experience. This is where Hampshire students learn to apply Socratic questioning across contexts rather than only within short dialogues. Our modes of inquiry are less about errors in logic and reasoning and more about synthesis and problem‑solving

Today that lens is a pretense of an online discourse that mocks, cancels, and fabricates with impunity. Tomorrow it can become the shared space of conversation – where the tone, gesture, and presence of direct encounter – where higher education finds its way back to open civic engagement.

Whether the questioner is Zohran Mamdani or the late Charlie Kirk, the pursuit of empirical truth demands more than retreating to staked out positions. It demands perspective-taking, active listening, and perhaps not leaping to long-settled conclusions. As Ken Burns reminds us in his latest work on America’s founding, there’s profound anchoring power when people drop their rhetorical armor and admit, “Wow, I had no idea.”

Dialog is not a serviceable experience in texting. Dialog is not dialed into the echoing reinforcement of news feeds. Dialog has no sway in the cultivation of holding grudges and exacting revenge. However, seizing on these opportunities produces the certainty of being heard in places our voices would otherwise be drowned out. A lasting, and yes awkward way out of our age of untrammeled self-expression. A chance to change history. And what is history, except the shaping of a consensus formed from looking back on the uncertainties of earlier times?

What the level above righteous indignation looks like.

Social Capital as Endowment: Hampshire’s Core Resource

Hampshire College cultivates a rare communications culture built on trust – the willingness to respect others’ right to speak and to listen without immediately reducing debate to winners and losers. In an era of polarized, us-versus‑them rhetoric, trust is the single resource that rises above performative persuasion and factional posturing. It is not merely balancing two sides; it is protecting the liberty to speak across political divides and resisting the pressure to sort people into preordained camps.

The most intense test of that trust comes in battles over First Amendment freedoms, where majorities often feel tempted to silence dissent. Hampshire’s approach treats those moments as opportunities rather than threats. Engaging with dissenting views trains students to hold disagreement without demonizing the other person, and to treat free expression as an elective practice, not a weapon of first or last resort. 

Here’s how that could play out in a Hampshire curriculum:

Two Channels of Communication: Hampshire students learn to speak in two complementary voices: the authentic self – personal, accountable, and engaged – and the independent observer – evidence‑driven, inclusive, and open to changing course.

Together these channels create credibility: a voice that is honest about its commitments while willing to follow where the non-performing facts lead.

A Counter to Algorithms: This method stands in direct contrast to seeking out extreme positions and then using technology as a rhetorical crutch to validate them. Credibility rejects that sycophantic script. The real skill is holding opposing ideas in mind simultaneously – a human strength that outstrips AI capacities and that serves public health, civic life, and collective well‑being better than marketplace competition.

Civility as Strength: The deliberate practice of addressing two opposable views with seriousness and restraint. Partisans may deride it, but speaking across differences is both difficult and powerful for amplifying the role of cooperative arrangements, a long-maligned tool of social contracts. The aim is not to declare the final truth or mete out justice; it is to deflate existential threats, reduce escalation, and create space for constructive action. This is a communication skill worth teaching, practicing, and defending.

Hampshire College is uniquely positioned to incubate and pilot alternative approaches to social conflict. Will the college rise to the challenges of our times?

Let Div Free both ring and resonate!

Conclusion: Embracing the Unknown

Hampshire’s survival strategy is simple and urgent: focus what works, do it superbly, and discard the rest. As Ed Wingenbach urged, aligning ambition with resources isn’t retreat – it’s concentration: sharpening the college’s strengths so its mission endures.

The antidote to performative certainty is credibility – a disciplined, evidence‑based stance that resists the showmanship of confident authoritarianism. Credibility doesn’t deny authenticity; it steadies it. It asks students to tolerate uncertainty, test assumptions, and accept the risk of being wrong as the price of genuine learning.

That practice lives in Hampshire’s Division III: sustained inquiry rooted in lived experience, public engagement, and creative risk. When students design, build, and defend their own work, they learn to challenge systems rather than submit to them.

That freedom isn’t just academic; it’s an on-ramp to re-imagining the world, much like a Hampshire degree itself.

If higher education must counter conformity and false bravado, Hampshire’s model is timely and practical: train people to think independently, act transparently, and rebuild public trust through rigor, not rhetoric. Before most college graduates are handed the wheel, Hampshire students are placed in the driver’s seat. That’s a tradition worth flexing. No pledges, no litmus tests. Just the freedom to be brave, experimental, non-conformist, and yes, a little obnoxious.

“Hey grad with the decorous honors,” the Hampster says: “You studied for the test. I had to invent the exam.”

Our not-so-secret sauce: The marathon race towards the Hampshire Diploma.

Commencement as Transition

When we attended, Hampshire people joked about it being an experiment. Do people still say that now that Hampshire is more than 50 years old?

Reflections on Hampshire’s Changing of the Guard

PART ONE:
Ed Wingenbach Leaves the Hampshire Stage

Since we live just a few miles from our alma mater, we usually go to the Hampshire College Commencement Ceremony. We gaze up at the banners hanging in eves of the big white tent. Can we find our years… ‘78 and ‘80? That was a lifetime ago.

The place is packed with people we don’t know. We have no connection to the graduating class or their parents- who are mostly younger than us. Even the faculty and staff who were a part of our experience have departed. What draws us here? Love of the place itself and many happy, crazy, distraught, meaningful memories, for sure. But we also share a deep feeling that our Hampshire experience shaped who we are and set us on our life path that might have been very different otherwise. The two of us share a love for this unique institution. 

When we attended, Hampshire people joked about it being an experiment. Do people still say that now that Hampshire is more than 50 years old?  And is it still growing and changing to rise to the challenges of our world? We hope so.

At its best, higher education anticipates crises, interrogates them, and builds systems that transcend inherited limits. At its worst, it retreats into privilege, shielded by endowments and exemptions. 

Ed Wingenbach, Hampshire’s outgoing leader, championed disruptive art, inclusive communities, and the recasting of global crises as a launch point into the Hampshire academic experience.

Yet on May 17, 2025, graduation day passed without invoking those ideals. Their urgency went unspoken, and no one claimed Hampshire’s role as a proving ground. Perhaps it’s because Hampshire has been facing down an existential threat throughout President Wingenbach’s term. 

The Parting of the New College Transfers

In  Wingenbach’s final Commencement address, he might have well been describing his own turn at the helm when he described many of these ranks as having taken a “leap into something fragile and unfinished.” He was referencing Hampshire grads who accepted  his invitation to transfer from the New College of Florida, an early casualty of culture war attempts on the right to derail progressive values.

Ed’s brinkmanship offered NCF students two stark choices:

A) Hampshire’s self-directed curriculum tackling diversity, misinformation, climate change, and critical race theory in pursuit of justice.

B) The new pedagogy at New College: A more monastic scholarship rooted in tradition, canon, and individual restraint. 

Both institutions see themselves as radically independent. Both demand students chart their own course. But here’s the catch: true inquiry  isn’t progressive or conservative — it follows evidence, not ideology. At times students at Hampshire may provoke the system, which gives them agency to ask their own questions and come up with their own viewpoints rather than being led blindly into one camp or another. 

To Ed’s lasting credit, he left behind a renewed manifesto — one that distilled the expansive questions this class first dared to ask into a coherent, compelling vision. This change reinvigorated the Hampshire experience for entering students and highlighted a unique difference between Hampshire and traditional schools.

The Exit Interview

Ed Wingenbach’s legacy goes beyond rescuing a faltering institution. With a $50 million campaign nearly complete, Hampshire is no longer on life support.

He reaffirmed its capacity for reinvention but left the task of confronting the relentless pace of today’s disorienting changes to his successor.  His address favored timeless lessons over timely engagement, and the ceremony offered reflection without reckoning. 

Left unsaid was what the future may hold for Hampshire. If Hampshire aims to lead in rethinking education, it must do more than adapt—it must engage, interrogate, and act. Reinvention demands relevance.

In the past, Wingenbach often cast Hampshire as a site of radical experimentation. But on graduation day, that vision felt distant—more concept than reality. Unspoken were the mounting pressures on progressive ideals, which may have shaped his decision to continue his work abroad. 

PART TWO
Leading from Strength:
Traditions Worth Celebrating

If Hampshire is always reinventing itself, what anchors remain? The tradition of self-directed study is more than a badge of nonconformity. Over Hampshire’s 50 plus years it has proven to be a life changing form of higher education for its 19,000 alumni.

Our personal experience attending recent graduation is that these ideals hover—present but unspoken. There are no models. Only stories. The unique group experience of the graduating class is on full display as it should be. However the special connection between the grads and their academic process is not. We don’t hear the innovative Hampshire approach described or celebrated.

The power of Div III when it’s truly unleashed is when a student refuses passive submission to the systems that shape us, and instead uses experience, creation, and connection to understand and challenge them.That freedom isn’t just academic; it’s an on-ramp to reimagining the world, much like a Hampshire degree itself. As we know, Hampshire alumni have gone on to be trailblazers in many fields.

The Rally Cries of Commencement

At the 2025 commencement, a question that hung in the air was, how important was the student/faculty relationship to these graduates? Oddly, acknowledgements by the student speakers did not include faculty. 

A tradition begun in the 2010s continued: honoring a staff member as a pillar of campus life. This year, Post Office Manager Jim Patten received a heartfelt ovation — the ceremony’s most poignant moment.

The only faculty member to speak was Jina Fast, slated to deliver the  faculty toast. Instead, she delivered a lecture on a past urban tragedy, the 1985 MOVE bombing in Philadelphia.It wasn’t a toast to the students. It was a polemic to no one in particular.

Keynote speaker Manuel “Manny” Castro 02F shared a powerful immigration story, but offered little reflection on how his Hampshire education shaped his path to becoming NYC’s Commissioner of Immigrant Affairs. His unique vantage — as a former undocumented immigrant and current policy leader —was left unexplored.

The one voice that rang true came from grandparent and trustee Julie Schecter 71F GP22:

“[T]his awful moment we are in is what Hampshire grads were made for. . . . [W]e aren’t going to get out of the war that we are in right now [against all we hold dear] by doing what we’re told. And you only succeeded at Hampshire by being brave, scared, experimental, and occasionally obnoxious. . . . We need you.”

Harkening back to our own experiences, close working relationships with our faculty advisors informed our post-Hampshire engagement with our workplaces. Their guidance on our Division Committees was the heart of our learning experience.

At a campus event in March of 2024, Ken Burns asserted similar views as he reflected on his work with Jerome Liebling. In our view, Burns wasn’t being nostalgic. He was pointing to what makes Hampshire unique, sustainable, and ultimately indispensable as a place of higher learning.

New Skin for the Old Ceremony

Hampshire is headed for an important transition as a search is on for Wingenbach’s successor. While attention to the bottom line remains critical for Hampshire’s future, we also need someone who will champion the radical act of owning one’s education.

We have seen what happens when this is left to chance. It happened in 2019. We were all there. Jonathan Podolsky has been following the current search, Read his thoughtful article on moving Hampshire forward here. Jonathon refers to our tradition of community input and transparency. We too will be exploring a revitalized expression of enduring Hampshire themes in future posts to Searching Out Loud.

Ed Wingenbach’s  tenure was about saving the institution — not about maximizing its true potential. Perhaps someday Hampshire College will have a president who went to Hampshire, who can speak about the power of a Hampshire Education from first hand experience rather than as an abstraction.

We salute you, Ed, for keeping the flame alive. We look forward to new leadership to light the path ahead.

Jimm Chanson: A Panegyric

This is not an obituary or a discography or some abstracted highlight reel to showcase the lucid brilliance of James T. Erickson (1962-2025), pen name Jimm Chanson. This is one friend’s appreciation. And there’s no mistaking the size of my gratitude with any proportionality of completeness in the writing of Jimm’s story.

The closest I’ll come to a definitive framing here is that Jimm was the superbrain. An encyclopedic recall coursing through the imagining of plausible fictions. And in the evidentiary world, the reckonings of a relentless polemicist.

If his body was the home of his soul on earth, it could be said that he really lived full-time in the attic, wandering out only to get to the office and occasional family visits. Most of us surround ourselves with other people, chores, appointments, and what we do to get by. We’re the casting director of the event calendars we keep. Little of this concerned Jimm. He was mostly surrounded by a vault of literature and history and his own illustrious pages. 

Jimm retreated into his own library stacks. Certainly, much of that immersion was spent in the service of feeding his superbrain appetite. Another reason could be the need to stockpile the patience he’d reserve to engage in routine interactions. It was not always natural for Jimm to break down his arguments in a size digestible for less-than-voracious intellects. His humility was not always a given, and was likely tested in the catering of affairs outside his mental neighborhood.

That didn’t make him a snob or a hermit. He was an awesome teacher to his colleagues. He was generous with his legal counseling. He not only tolerated but applauded the many helping hands that were required when his health faultered. When Charlie Nieland, J.M. Dobies and myself visited him earlier this summer, he was proud to salute his country of choice. And her name was California. His magnanimity extended to the team play in his workload. Even when commanding his firm’s lion’s share of cases, one surmises its portfolio was more a reflection of James T. Erickson’s billable hours than by the collective experience of the other attorneys.

He’s… (So Reclusive)

Jimm lived nearly every day and night at a second floor walk-up on the outskirts of the Santa Clara University legal program he graduated from in 2006. There was no community outside of work. But he was solitary by choice. And there were few if any unresolved matters attending his attention to others, or even his own rock operas, novels, and poems.

There was no to-do list for putting such ephemeral affairs as song titles or play lists in order. But that’s where the satisfaction of closure ends. The unfinished pages of Jimm Erickson could fill several lifetimes of entire creative teams. He was weary from the compromises of an artist doing the bidding of a full-time attorney. His body would not let him forget the neglect inflicted for living in that mental attic of his all these years.

But he fought and wrestled and swore through his sagging teeth and halting breath that he wanted more of this life. The very one he would have continued to live free of cirrhosis, tumors, and bodily eviction notices: you maladies work things out amongst yourselves. I’m just going to plunge into the out-of-print section of my reading piles.

Learning Jimm (Student Edition)

I didn’t bump into Jimm. We were never properly introduced. Rather I was lured into an aura by a song. He was singing with his dorm room door open as if he was listening to his own soaring voice for the first time. Jimm was shot into Hampshire College out of a canyon of his own gleeful creation. The classroom had been impervious to his superbrain appetites for rarefied knowledge. Now in the wilds of self-directed discovery, he was freed from the demands of mandatory course loads. Jimm was ebullient. His muse was in full command. He was surrounded by other contrarians, misfits, and his own whimsical intuitions. Formal education had no claims on Jimm’s first semester.

The Answer was the cannon ball that Jimm pointed at the blank canvas of posterity. The Answer was a band of underdeveloped musicians that performed his unfolding songbook with varying degrees of accomplishment. The recording was equally unrefined and every overdub was served up with generous backdrops of tape hiss. Core to the project’s grandiosity: the premise that simple exposure to the band’s sonic elocution by chart-bound talent scouts would lead to that first recording contract. And as for band chemistry? We had never actually played together. We promised to rehearse more once some offers could be entertained. 

The audacity of it all was fueled by three things: (1) our reverence of the musical heroes we were targeting with these Maxell 90 cassettes, (2) Jimm’s surging song catalog, and (3) the nascent arranging and recording chops of Charlie Nieland, our lead bassist, guitarist, and chief Jimm collaborator. What did we all hear in the uniform silence to our “unsolicited demo?” That is a testament largely to the raw creative gumption of untested youth. 

While the bidding war to sign The Answer never ensued, the desire for acclaim and recognition shadowed Jimm throughout his life. There were never any benefactors, agents, or licensing arrangements. The practical business side of Jimm was seemingly walled off from his industrious muse. Speakeasy, one of his crowning achievements, was an historic novel about police corruption that never would have made it to press without the diligent assistance of his brother, Bill.

In 2013 JM Dobies, another former bandmate, a.k.a. Mal Thursday, pitched the notion of a catalog re-creation with an assemblage of session hands who could give Jimm’s melodies, chord structures, and middle eights the polish justified by the quality of his songwriting. Jimm wrote back that Mal’s intentions resonated with that same hunger for recognition:

I imagined Bob Dylan phoning Elvis Costello and saying, “WE both were inspired by Gravity [Suicide, the Novel, whatever] — this poor guy is completely unknown — let’s get some other people who were into it [here, name anyone I admire], and record a tribute album!” And I was able to sleep, ha ha, visions of sugar plums and so on. So that was a random thing, and the next day you [JM] wrote. 

The Art of Remembrance

The biggest challenge for paying tribute is not about parsing an artist’s complexities, time-stamping their inventories, or crediting their authorship. It’s not in the curation of a collection. It’s in the excavation. The deeper soul dive that unearths and preserves the essence of birthing the artist’s own creations.  

I first experienced this in forming a memorial scholarship fund to honor my mother, Ruthellen Pollan. How do we keep her memory alive? We do it in the service of supporting young artists that come through the program she spearheaded.

With Jimm there’s no interviews to transcribe, paintings to hang, or film to screen. But there is the writing and the music, as half-finished in its capture as it is rich in its composition. There is the vast reserve of a restless dynamo. There may well be a dormant community yet to live through this realization of Jimm’s creative experience. Jimm even fancied cutting a future profile as a cult figure. Who’s to say his obscurity is set in stone?

The raw building materials for this are exemplified by a gentleman named “Nelson.” Now I don’t know Nelson. Nelson isn’t sure he ever met Jimm. But from a brief introduction, it sounds like Nelson nurtures some wanderlust for stumbling onto Jimm’s sub rosa empire of unscratched gemstones. Here’s how another former band mate John Lebhar describes Nelson on the periphery of that excavation:

After I shared the news of Jimm’s passing he [Nelson] had heard so many things about Jimm that he felt he knew him although they never met. As he put it, everyone I ever played music with in the [Pioneer] Valley had a story about Jimm. It’s true that his musical legacy is bigger than life and certainly bigger than it ever manifested itself into as recordings  and more importantly shareable media. I hope all of his friends can help to make that happen. Thinking about all the heavy hearts and for some reason Jimm’s crazy ripped up bell bottoms!

We all did have our one agenda item for that last visit in June. Mine was in crediting Jimm as the lightning rod for aligning our respective destinies into a creative path that carried well past our time together at Hampshire. For Jimm it was the pride he felt for gracing his signature to our personal copies of Speakeasy. That signature serves as an engraving for all things worthy of our collective debt implied in the treasuring of Jimm’s creations.

Returning again to the not-small-matter of incompleteness, I hope this early foray into the consequential nature of Jimm’s life might inspire other friends and his family to broker a broader understanding of The Jimm story on their own terms.

The ease of delivering this invitation does not always resonate with the most welcoming of memories, as former school chum, neighbor, and bandmate, David Karlin can attest. Hopefully the estrangement takes a backseat to the outstretched role that the Erickson household played in shaping Jimm, as well as his oldest friend. Some historians are determined to get to the bottom of the dilemmas they unearth. This one seeks a resolution. 

Reconstructed Works (A First Stab)

The richness of his legacy was reflected in his writing discipline. He was able to meet his own self-imposed deadlines if not the broader social moments he was addressing through his illustrious excursions into…

Hot Rhetoric, Cold War: Me and God at Yale (1988): Jimm’s third of five rock operas and the only one memorialized through the studio recordings of The Answer’s first and last band reunion in 1988. A diatribunal laying siege to the underhanded smugness of W.F. Buckley with an unapologetic shout-out to Gore Vidal. (Collection alert: You can access the complete opera through Charlie’s Dropbox folder here).

Porn Industry Intimacies: Weak and Willing (1993): The one screenplay of the collection features the sin wages of a male sex worker in the pioneering days of the early eighties, preempting PJ Anderson’s Boogie Nights and the birth of Viagra by three and five years respectively. I recollect sharing the manuscript with Garo, another lifelong chum and Doubleday literary editor. Let me tell you: nothing surfaced Jimm’s mercurial tendencies faster than the marked up rewrites of a detached editor.

Thirty Wild Songs from Fame, Fleas, and Fox Sisters: Typhoid Mary Sessions (1997-98): Jimm’s last collection of songs were unsparing and explosive in their long-form exhaustion. One cut, The Typhoid Mary Sweepstakes (Ship of Fleas)  runs 10 minutes without a refrain. Most of us fans can’t help but reflect wistfully on his songwriting retirement at age 35. Jimm shared not this sense of longing and lost interest in most music once he stopped composing. (Collection alert: Charlie has the tapes and will revive these recordings digitally in the coming months).

From Milwaukee’s Streets to Jim Crow’s Heartland: Speakeasy (2011): Jimm’s seminal work and manifest gift to the field of historical fiction features Judson W. Minor (Milwaukee’s first black police officer) as its protagonist, hero, and upholder of the virtuous dragnet inside the corruption and counter-punches of the city’s Gin Alley district. (Collection alert: You can order on Amazon or Strand Books).

Domestic Unrest Through Radical Spyglasses: The Center of Attention (2016) An espionage saga told by gold coast hippies. Pay phones, roach clips, muscle cars, and the ghost of Dennis Hopper set the stage for Jimm’s own unique re-staging of Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. A bulging bill of federal offenses handled in the true William Kunstler tradition. (Collection alert: To be released as an e-book by Bill in the next year or so).

Unrequited Rejection: Eros and Thanatos and So On (2020-22) This project arose from the deep funk that corralled Jimm when he developed long haul Covid at the onset of the pandemic. Much of this outpouring is inspired by his unresolved reflections on past relationships. The collateral damage of these romantic incursions are not for the feint of heart, intellect, or levity of spirit.

New Collection: (2024-2025) Jimm composed 37 additional poems in between medical interventions and hospital visits. Mostly grappling with mortality and the smouldering embers of his unfinished pages. Here is his last, presented as grand master ironist, in its original form:

PANEGYRIC
 
I will sleep with myself tonight
as though I were at once a beautiful woman,
witty and intelligent; loving towards
me too.
          I will sleep with myself
tonight as though I were a “raging”
genius, whatever that is, in a white
heat of anger and paranoia.
                                           I will
sleep with myself tonight as though
time were not passing, and I
were a ghost, observant and communicative,
 
tapping on tables to give warning of my
 
resentment at the quick, who never know
quite what to say in response.  I will sleep
with myself tonight as though I were
a poet, too precious for words (so goes
 
the cliché, the cliché that comes
 
to mind), my mind focussed on things
like whether I begin too many lines
with conjunctions or … what else
is it I avoid?  I will sleep,
 
I know I will, with myself
tonight, as though it
were tonight, as though
it were over, which it is.

Jimm Chanson,
February, 2025