Buy Out the Empire: Making an Offer He Can’t Refuse

(Taking Up) The Collection

An Exit Strategy for Trump 2, Year 2

Taking Up The Collection

The Collection is a collective action to disrupt and dethrone the Imperial Presidency by gamifying dissent and offering a massive, 24/7 “Exit Jackpot” to reclaim the American republic.

Deal Making as a Rite of Passage

As the presidency transitions from a public office to a luxury brand, the opposition must stop reacting and start negotiating. Welcome to “The Collection,” a high-stakes digital series that frames the “Imperial Presidency” as a distressed asset ripe for a corporate buyout.

This isn’t a fundraiser for television ads; it’s a live, 24/7 “Exit Jackpot” offered to the President in exchange for his immediate resignation. By contrasting “Royal Spend” pageantry with the systemic gutting of the American safety net, the show gamifies dissent. It transforms the public from passive victims into active shareholders, making an offer no “man of the deal” can ignore.


Speculative Repair List

To win, the opposition must control the narrative by treating “The Collection” as a high-stakes spectacle. This isn’t a standard fundraiser; it is a strategic “priming of the pump” designed to maximize both viewership and capital through collective action.

Trump will likely sense the trap. The Collection weaponizes ridicule, exposing his thinning skin while highlighting the massive national debt – the “Royal Spend” – accumulated under his watch. Unlike traditional protests, he cannot simply shout over this format. As he retaliates with legal threats and censorship, the opposition should double or triple matching funds, using his aggression to fuel the jackpot.

If his desire for vengeance leads him to suppress the event, that very interference should trigger the endgame: a final “Priority Vote” where the public instantly earmarks and distributes the funds.

How would that work?


Enter The Imperial Ledger

Pilot Episode 101: “The Cost of the Crown” | Date: Immediate Future

CUE 1: A high-contrast, “Late-Night Noir” aesthetic. The HOST stands before a massive digital screen – The Ledger – scrolling with gold-on-black text and ticker tape numbers.

HOST: Good evening, citizens. Welcome to the first edition of The Imperial Ledger, the only accounting firm authorized by the reality of your own bank accounts.

Since the Restoration began in January, we’ve been told we’re living through a “Golden Age.” But gold is heavy, and someone has to carry it. Tonight, we look at the balance sheet for the 47th Presidency as we closed out 2025.

CUE 2: A 3D rendering of the White House displays The East Wing highlighted in red, then dissolves into a pile of digital rubble.

White House East Wing demolished as Trump moves forward with ballroom construction, AP photos show, Darlene Superville; Jacquelyn Martin, Associated Press, October 23, 2025

HOST: Item one on the Ledger: The Demolition of History. In October, the President decided the East Wing – a fixture since 1902 – wasn’t “ballroom” enough. He tore it down. In its place, we’re getting a $400 million, 90,000-square-foot “State Ballroom.” It’s designed to hold 999 people – because 1,000 would be “ostentatious,” I’m sure. The White House calls it a “National Security” priority. Apparently, our primary defense against foreign threats is a really, really big dance floor for donors from BlackRock, Nvidia, Meta, Google, and Amazon.

Billionaires at Trump’s inauguration hold wealth equal to 1/3 India’s GDP, Vasudha Mukherjee, Business Standard, January 21, 2025

CUE 3: The Ledger scrolls to a list of names: “The Donald J. Trump and The John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts.”

HOST: Next, the Branding Fee. As of late December, the Kennedy Center is officially the “Trump-Kennedy Center.” Because nothing says “Performing Arts” like a hostile takeover by the Chairman of the Board. The new gold signage is still fresh. It’s the ultimate Participation Trophy: President Trump didn’t win a Grammy, so he just bought the building.

CUE 4: The Ledger shifts to the “Repair List” for the common man. Numbers start spinning rapidly.

Quiet Over Trump’s Kennedy Center Grab Risks Capitulation, Eleanor Clift, The Daily Beat, February 13, 2025

Three Repair Worthy Collections

Some viable candidate causes include:

A. The Nutritional Safety Net (Repairing Food Security)

The Fix: Funding “Community Granaries” in the 2,000+ counties most affected by inflation and benefit rollbacks.

With the administration’s proposed $300 billion in cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), an estimated 16 million children face reduced access to food.

HOST: But let’s look at the “One Big Beautiful Bill.” While you were busy getting your $25,000 tax deduction on tip income — if you’re lucky enough to make that much in tips…

#Impact AreaMeasurable Change & Outcome
1Medicaid Funding ChasmBans “provider taxes,” stripping states of $340 billion in revenue used to draw down federal Medicaid matches.
2SNAP Benefit ErosionCuts federal food assistance by $187 billion (20%), forcing a 30–50% surge in demand at local food banks.
3Admin Compliance SurgeForces states to build IT systems to track 80-hour/month work requirements for millions of Medicaid/SNAP recipients.
4State Revenue DrainAutomatic tax conformity is projected to slash state revenues by $100M to $1.2B per state (e.g., Colorado, Arizona).
5Healthcare Churn RisksCBO predicts 11.8 million people will lose coverage, increasing “uncompensated care” costs for providers by an estimated 15%.
6Work-for-Benefits MandateRequires 80 hours/month of work or community service for Medicaid/SNAP recipients (ages 19–64).
7Medicaid Cost SharingImplements co-payments of up to $35 per service for ACA expansion adults (income 100–138% of FPL).
8Graduate Loan CapsLimits federal borrowing for Master’s degrees to $20,500/year, forcing students to seek private loans for excess costs.
9SNAP Exemption RemovalSubjects 300,000+ veterans and formerly homeless individuals to the 3-month benefit time limit.
10Coverage Loss ForecastCBO projects 10.9 million people will lose health insurance by 2034 due to eligibility and subsidy changes.

That’s the trade: You get to deduct the interest on your new car loan, but your neighbor’s kid doesn’t get lunch. That’s the “Imperial” exchange rate. 

CUE: Proportion of Elon Musk’s stock options that would cover the SNAP shortfall…

Musk Wins $1 Trillion Pay Package, Creating Split Screen on Wealth in America, Rebecca F. Elliot; Jack Ewing; Reid J. Epstein, New York Times, November 6, 2025

B. Healthcare Restoration (Repairing the Safety Net)

After the only town hospital closed, a North Carolina city blames politicians: There’s no help for you here, Amanda Seitz; Allen G. Breed, The Independent, May 20, 2024

Current budget projections include a $1 trillion cut to Medicaid over the next decade. This is estimated to leave roughly 10 million to 11.8 million Americans uninsured.

The Fix: A “Mobile Health Corps” specifically for rural areas where 1 in 4 residents currently relies on Medicaid for primary care and birth coverage.

HOST: “Last month, 12 rural hospitals in the Midwest closed their doors due to the Medicaid ‘Efficiency Purge.’ Tonight, your Priority Vote can move $50 million of the Collection’s interest directly to these facilities. You have the power. You have the funds. Don’t just watch the empire rise. Fund the restoration. Take up the Collection.”

The Jackpot is growing. But while the President waits for the right number to step down, the clock is ticking for the rest of us.

CUE: Somber, black-and-white footage of a closed rural medical clinic. A small child sits on the steps. A countdown timer appears in the corner.


C. Small Business Tariffs Relief (Repairing the Bootstrap Work Ethic)

Trump’s First Year Back, in 10 Charts, Steven Rattner, New York Times, December 27, 2025

Recent trade barriers have hiked raw material costs by an average of 22%, leaving local manufacturers unable to compete with subsidized global giants. Projections suggest 15,000 small-town family businesses will shutter by year-end without immediate intervention. 

The Fix: Direct “Bridge-to-Build” grants for businesses hit by the “One Big Beautiful Bill” trade policies. Provide immediate liquidity and supply-chain pivoting funds for domestic businesses with fewer than 50 employees.

HOST: Which brings us to why we are here. The President knows he is bored by the price of housing. He’s not focused on the cost of healthcare. He’s above the concerns of the majority of Americans that come from more modest roots and less favorable gene pools. And he loves a deal. And we know he loves to move on when the price is right.

Trump Attacks Obamacare Without a Health Plan, Dean Baker, CEPR, October 6, 2025

CUE: The host points directly into the camera:

So, it’s time for the Final Collection. If the cost of his “reign” is too high for the Constitution, maybe it’s just low enough for a buyout. We are opening the “Self-Removal Fund.” A golden parachute so large, so beautiful, so massive that even he can’t say no to a private retirement in Mar-a-Lago permanently. 

Look at the Ledger. Look at the ballroom. Look at our neighbors. Then, look at your phone. Take up the Collection. Contribute to the Jackpot for his early exit. Let’s make him an offer he can’t refuse – before there’s nothing left of the People’s House but the gold leaf.”


Why “The Collection” Works Where Politics Fails

Conventional political channels – courts, legislation, and traditional protests – rely on norms that the current “Imperial Presidency” has already discarded. These methods are too slow, predictable, and easily ignored by a leader who controls the narrative through sheer media saturation.

“The Collection” succeeds by moving the battlefield from the ballot box to the balance sheet. By treating a President with a 36% approval rating as a “distressed asset,” it converts abstract frustration into a tangible, ever-growing Buyout Number to cap his insatiable temperment. This format strips the leader of his narrative dominance, relegating him to a mere contestant whose only move is to quit. It traps a “man of the deal” in his own branding, forcing him into defensive, damaging optics that traditional politics simply cannot achieve.


Heading Trump Off at the Institutional Standoff Corral

Institutional Capture: Legislative and judicial checks are increasingly slow or neutralized by executive overreach, making “legal” resistance feel like a theoretical exercise rather than a functional one.

The Attention Economy: Traditional protests are easily framed as “partisan noise.” “The Collection” uses a high-stakes, “Jackpot” format that the media cannot afford to ignore, forcing the administration to respond to the public’s terms.

The Language of the Deal: The current administration views the country through the lens of corporate ownership. By framing the presidency as a buyout opportunity, the opposition speaks the administration’s only fluent language, making the “Golden Parachute” a psychological trap that bypasses ideological gridlock.


Turning the Corner

By prioritizing personal grudges, Trump undermines his own leverage as a negotiator. His brand is no longer just threatened by his erratic behavior, but by something more damaging: predictability. This growing boredom may be exactly what allows America to regain its collective focus.

To succeed in 2026, the opposition must “flip the script” by choosing humor, consensus, and accessibility over the reactive whiplash that defined 2025. We cannot reverse history; we can only change how we move forward.

New World Order: Art of the Deal vs Art of War, Tang Meng Kit, Asia Times, April 30, 2025

Why Hampshire? Why Now?

In mid‑October, 500 members of the Hampshire community gathered for a timely symposium on AI, authoritarianism, and Hampshire College, highlighting the college’s civic role. Filmmaker‑historian Ken Burns ’71F, AI researcher Gary Marcus ’86F, and AAC&U president Lynn Pasquerella P’08 laid out urgent challenges and practical responses. These notes distill the panel’s key insights and make the case that Hampshire’s experimental, community‑centered pedagogy is not grounds for nostalgia. It’s a call to action that models how higher education can help repair the fraying social contract between leaders, institutions, and citizens.

October 18, 2025:

Tending to our founding seeds

The Home Court Advantages of Immersive Education

The most empowering message was delivered by Ms. Pasquerella. It was the writ large reinsertion of the humanities into the desired skills in an AI-infested job market. Not only a self-evident observation, but an actual home court advantage for Team Hampshire. Understanding the motivations for change is a first-mover advantage for building a healthy tolerance for risk, and robust and disciplined experimentation. That kind of trial and error comes with the uncharted turf of a Hampshire degree. It’s that deeper connection to purpose that connects to internships, community service, work study, and field work.

Perhaps these are some of the reasons why the study abroad bandwagon is coming home to roost in the surrounding Pioneer Valley community. It’s the local impact of real world change that gives our farm center students a laboratory the size of the bountiful Connecticut River farm delta.

This kind of hands-on experience in climate adaptation and planting methods are a benefit that extends our body of academic work from curriculum to discovery to the benefits shared with Hampshire’s neighboring communities.

Hampshire’s small size and under-the-radar positioning is another advantage. Freed from the pressures of ranking‑driven branding and donor expectations that shape many A‑list colleges, it can iterate pedagogically, take curricular risks, and center marginalized voices without needing to conform to prestige metrics. Less visibility means more freedom to prototype education models, to fail fast, and to scale what works, producing innovations that larger institutions later adopt. In short, Hampshire preserves and advances the democratic promise of higher education–to cultivate independent thinkers who can invent new forms of knowledge and public service–precisely because it operates outside the spotlight and forces that constrain academic purpose.

AI Communications Skills: Conflict Resolution 101

As told by a deep fake: The counterpoint to faith is not doubt. It is uncertainty.

With AI, those softer skills of emotional intelligence, the resolution-seeking nature of conflict resolution are evolving into harder skills. Harder because the substitution of AI for companionship is the first in a steady succession of ill-advised uses of AI in the mid 2020s: a word probability parlor game now positioned as the cornerstone of the American economy. It will take the forceful presence of human agents to impress upon a distracted and shallow marketplace that the faking of relatedness doesn’t justify the harm posed by…

1. Extortion-friendly deep fakes 

2. Synthetic friendships, and

3. Fabricated term papers

As Mr. Marcus intimates, AI in its infancy deserves better responses than stuffing genies back in bottles or moving fast to break things.

One wish I do have for my future Hamsters is a warming to the idea of tolerance and not to see the world of ideas as either a shooting gallery or an excuse for retreats to safe spaces. Hampshire students are traditionally a questioning folk, sometimes bordering on obsessional. Why not take that unflinching curiosity to the next level? Why not reimagine an as-yet unformed social space that privileges emotional intelligence above moral crusading

Look at distrust in the face for its name is uncertainty. Commandeer what makes us so relentless and apply it to the hearing out of conflicting ideas. 

“Are you insane?” you’re thinking by now. A decidedly lefty school as a force for social moderation. A bulwark against the flagrant refusals of those in power to return the favor. Are you kidding me?

What’s truly transformative isn’t merely the act of changing our minds – or challenging those who unsettle us. It’s the moment our perspectives expand through genuine engagement with voices beyond our own lived experience. This is where Hampshire students learn to apply Socratic questioning across contexts rather than only within short dialogues. Our modes of inquiry are less about errors in logic and reasoning and more about synthesis and problem‑solving

Today that lens is a pretense of an online discourse that mocks, cancels, and fabricates with impunity. Tomorrow it can become the shared space of conversation – where the tone, gesture, and presence of direct encounter – where higher education finds its way back to open civic engagement.

Whether the questioner is Zohran Mamdani or the late Charlie Kirk, the pursuit of empirical truth demands more than retreating to staked out positions. It demands perspective-taking, active listening, and perhaps not leaping to long-settled conclusions. As Ken Burns reminds us in his latest work on America’s founding, there’s profound anchoring power when people drop their rhetorical armor and admit, “Wow, I had no idea.”

Dialog is not a serviceable experience in texting. Dialog is not dialed into the echoing reinforcement of news feeds. Dialog has no sway in the cultivation of holding grudges and exacting revenge. However, seizing on these opportunities produces the certainty of being heard in places our voices would otherwise be drowned out. A lasting, and yes awkward way out of our age of untrammeled self-expression. A chance to change history. And what is history, except the shaping of a consensus formed from looking back on the uncertainties of earlier times?

What the level above righteous indignation looks like.

Social Capital as Endowment: Hampshire’s Core Resource

Hampshire College cultivates a rare communications culture built on trust – the willingness to respect others’ right to speak and to listen without immediately reducing debate to winners and losers. In an era of polarized, us-versus‑them rhetoric, trust is the single resource that rises above performative persuasion and factional posturing. It is not merely balancing two sides; it is protecting the liberty to speak across political divides and resisting the pressure to sort people into preordained camps.

The most intense test of that trust comes in battles over First Amendment freedoms, where majorities often feel tempted to silence dissent. Hampshire’s approach treats those moments as opportunities rather than threats. Engaging with dissenting views trains students to hold disagreement without demonizing the other person, and to treat free expression as an elective practice, not a weapon of first or last resort. 

Here’s how that could play out in a Hampshire curriculum:

Two Channels of Communication: Hampshire students learn to speak in two complementary voices: the authentic self – personal, accountable, and engaged – and the independent observer – evidence‑driven, inclusive, and open to changing course.

Together these channels create credibility: a voice that is honest about its commitments while willing to follow where the non-performing facts lead.

A Counter to Algorithms: This method stands in direct contrast to seeking out extreme positions and then using technology as a rhetorical crutch to validate them. Credibility rejects that sycophantic script. The real skill is holding opposing ideas in mind simultaneously – a human strength that outstrips AI capacities and that serves public health, civic life, and collective well‑being better than marketplace competition.

Civility as Strength: The deliberate practice of addressing two opposable views with seriousness and restraint. Partisans may deride it, but speaking across differences is both difficult and powerful for amplifying the role of cooperative arrangements, a long-maligned tool of social contracts. The aim is not to declare the final truth or mete out justice; it is to deflate existential threats, reduce escalation, and create space for constructive action. This is a communication skill worth teaching, practicing, and defending.

Hampshire College is uniquely positioned to incubate and pilot alternative approaches to social conflict. Will the college rise to the challenges of our times?

Let Div Free both ring and resonate!

Conclusion: Embracing the Unknown

Hampshire’s survival strategy is simple and urgent: focus what works, do it superbly, and discard the rest. As Ed Wingenbach urged, aligning ambition with resources isn’t retreat – it’s concentration: sharpening the college’s strengths so its mission endures.

The antidote to performative certainty is credibility – a disciplined, evidence‑based stance that resists the showmanship of confident authoritarianism. Credibility doesn’t deny authenticity; it steadies it. It asks students to tolerate uncertainty, test assumptions, and accept the risk of being wrong as the price of genuine learning.

That practice lives in Hampshire’s Division III: sustained inquiry rooted in lived experience, public engagement, and creative risk. When students design, build, and defend their own work, they learn to challenge systems rather than submit to them.

That freedom isn’t just academic; it’s an on-ramp to re-imagining the world, much like a Hampshire degree itself.

If higher education must counter conformity and false bravado, Hampshire’s model is timely and practical: train people to think independently, act transparently, and rebuild public trust through rigor, not rhetoric. Before most college graduates are handed the wheel, Hampshire students are placed in the driver’s seat. That’s a tradition worth flexing. No pledges, no litmus tests. Just the freedom to be brave, experimental, non-conformist, and yes, a little obnoxious.

“Hey grad with the decorous honors,” the Hampster says: “You studied for the test. I had to invent the exam.”

Our not-so-secret sauce: The marathon race towards the Hampshire Diploma.

Commencement as Transition

When we attended, Hampshire people joked about it being an experiment. Do people still say that now that Hampshire is more than 50 years old?

Reflections on Hampshire’s Changing of the Guard

PART ONE:
Ed Wingenbach Leaves the Hampshire Stage

Since we live just a few miles from our alma mater, we usually go to the Hampshire College Commencement Ceremony. We gaze up at the banners hanging in eves of the big white tent. Can we find our years… ‘78 and ‘80? That was a lifetime ago.

The place is packed with people we don’t know. We have no connection to the graduating class or their parents- who are mostly younger than us. Even the faculty and staff who were a part of our experience have departed. What draws us here? Love of the place itself and many happy, crazy, distraught, meaningful memories, for sure. But we also share a deep feeling that our Hampshire experience shaped who we are and set us on our life path that might have been very different otherwise. The two of us share a love for this unique institution. 

When we attended, Hampshire people joked about it being an experiment. Do people still say that now that Hampshire is more than 50 years old?  And is it still growing and changing to rise to the challenges of our world? We hope so.

At its best, higher education anticipates crises, interrogates them, and builds systems that transcend inherited limits. At its worst, it retreats into privilege, shielded by endowments and exemptions. 

Ed Wingenbach, Hampshire’s outgoing leader, championed disruptive art, inclusive communities, and the recasting of global crises as a launch point into the Hampshire academic experience.

Yet on May 17, 2025, graduation day passed without invoking those ideals. Their urgency went unspoken, and no one claimed Hampshire’s role as a proving ground. Perhaps it’s because Hampshire has been facing down an existential threat throughout President Wingenbach’s term. 

The Parting of the New College Transfers

In  Wingenbach’s final Commencement address, he might have well been describing his own turn at the helm when he described many of these ranks as having taken a “leap into something fragile and unfinished.” He was referencing Hampshire grads who accepted  his invitation to transfer from the New College of Florida, an early casualty of culture war attempts on the right to derail progressive values.

Ed’s brinkmanship offered NCF students two stark choices:

A) Hampshire’s self-directed curriculum tackling diversity, misinformation, climate change, and critical race theory in pursuit of justice.

B) The new pedagogy at New College: A more monastic scholarship rooted in tradition, canon, and individual restraint. 

Both institutions see themselves as radically independent. Both demand students chart their own course. But here’s the catch: true inquiry  isn’t progressive or conservative — it follows evidence, not ideology. At times students at Hampshire may provoke the system, which gives them agency to ask their own questions and come up with their own viewpoints rather than being led blindly into one camp or another. 

To Ed’s lasting credit, he left behind a renewed manifesto — one that distilled the expansive questions this class first dared to ask into a coherent, compelling vision. This change reinvigorated the Hampshire experience for entering students and highlighted a unique difference between Hampshire and traditional schools.

The Exit Interview

Ed Wingenbach’s legacy goes beyond rescuing a faltering institution. With a $50 million campaign nearly complete, Hampshire is no longer on life support.

He reaffirmed its capacity for reinvention but left the task of confronting the relentless pace of today’s disorienting changes to his successor.  His address favored timeless lessons over timely engagement, and the ceremony offered reflection without reckoning. 

Left unsaid was what the future may hold for Hampshire. If Hampshire aims to lead in rethinking education, it must do more than adapt—it must engage, interrogate, and act. Reinvention demands relevance.

In the past, Wingenbach often cast Hampshire as a site of radical experimentation. But on graduation day, that vision felt distant—more concept than reality. Unspoken were the mounting pressures on progressive ideals, which may have shaped his decision to continue his work abroad. 

PART TWO
Leading from Strength:
Traditions Worth Celebrating

If Hampshire is always reinventing itself, what anchors remain? The tradition of self-directed study is more than a badge of nonconformity. Over Hampshire’s 50 plus years it has proven to be a life changing form of higher education for its 19,000 alumni.

Our personal experience attending recent graduation is that these ideals hover—present but unspoken. There are no models. Only stories. The unique group experience of the graduating class is on full display as it should be. However the special connection between the grads and their academic process is not. We don’t hear the innovative Hampshire approach described or celebrated.

The power of Div III when it’s truly unleashed is when a student refuses passive submission to the systems that shape us, and instead uses experience, creation, and connection to understand and challenge them.That freedom isn’t just academic; it’s an on-ramp to reimagining the world, much like a Hampshire degree itself. As we know, Hampshire alumni have gone on to be trailblazers in many fields.

The Rally Cries of Commencement

At the 2025 commencement, a question that hung in the air was, how important was the student/faculty relationship to these graduates? Oddly, acknowledgements by the student speakers did not include faculty. 

A tradition begun in the 2010s continued: honoring a staff member as a pillar of campus life. This year, Post Office Manager Jim Patten received a heartfelt ovation — the ceremony’s most poignant moment.

The only faculty member to speak was Jina Fast, slated to deliver the  faculty toast. Instead, she delivered a lecture on a past urban tragedy, the 1985 MOVE bombing in Philadelphia.It wasn’t a toast to the students. It was a polemic to no one in particular.

Keynote speaker Manuel “Manny” Castro 02F shared a powerful immigration story, but offered little reflection on how his Hampshire education shaped his path to becoming NYC’s Commissioner of Immigrant Affairs. His unique vantage — as a former undocumented immigrant and current policy leader —was left unexplored.

The one voice that rang true came from grandparent and trustee Julie Schecter 71F GP22:

“[T]his awful moment we are in is what Hampshire grads were made for. . . . [W]e aren’t going to get out of the war that we are in right now [against all we hold dear] by doing what we’re told. And you only succeeded at Hampshire by being brave, scared, experimental, and occasionally obnoxious. . . . We need you.”

Harkening back to our own experiences, close working relationships with our faculty advisors informed our post-Hampshire engagement with our workplaces. Their guidance on our Division Committees was the heart of our learning experience.

At a campus event in March of 2024, Ken Burns asserted similar views as he reflected on his work with Jerome Liebling. In our view, Burns wasn’t being nostalgic. He was pointing to what makes Hampshire unique, sustainable, and ultimately indispensable as a place of higher learning.

New Skin for the Old Ceremony

Hampshire is headed for an important transition as a search is on for Wingenbach’s successor. While attention to the bottom line remains critical for Hampshire’s future, we also need someone who will champion the radical act of owning one’s education.

We have seen what happens when this is left to chance. It happened in 2019. We were all there. Jonathan Podolsky has been following the current search, Read his thoughtful article on moving Hampshire forward here. Jonathon refers to our tradition of community input and transparency. We too will be exploring a revitalized expression of enduring Hampshire themes in future posts to Searching Out Loud.

Ed Wingenbach’s  tenure was about saving the institution — not about maximizing its true potential. Perhaps someday Hampshire College will have a president who went to Hampshire, who can speak about the power of a Hampshire Education from first hand experience rather than as an abstraction.

We salute you, Ed, for keeping the flame alive. We look forward to new leadership to light the path ahead.

Hampshire is Back

50th anniversary scenes and takeaways of Hampshire’s return from the brink.

The College Turns 50
and Learns What It’s Grown Up to Be

Mounting the comeback without staples.

Last weekend my wife Patty (F78) and I attended Hampshire College’s 50th Anniversary celebration. We live one town out from where we first laid eyes on the future, long before we realized our marriage is what that future needed to be fully lived in. We went expecting some chance encounters with a few peripheral acquaintances and a newly untangled neck lanyard. What we left with was the renewal of hope that the future not only required but could insist on the continuation of Hampshire College. The grandiosity was unexpected. But there is much to celebrate.

We arrived with guarded, pensive questions:

    • Is the existential crisis of prepandemic times only visible in the rear view? Is Hampshire back for good?
    • At age 50, is Camp Hamp ready to declare itself the institutional grown-up in a crowded room of fat elites, insulated by their liberalism?
    • Does such emancipation lend authority to the traditional school fight song? The one calling out the injustices that now masquerade as the business of the usual?

Davis Bates F73 retells the story of the Div Free Bell: “You go out into the world and Division 4, 5, and 6 will find you.”

Paraphrasing President Ed Wingenbach here, few colleges can fall back on its social justice legacies without resting on its quixotic laurels. The Hamp he inherited didn’t have that financial luxury. What it did have was a devoted alumni community that considered Hampshire their academic soulmate. Not some option on a roulette wheel of school rankings but the only choice for them. An improbable mix of trust fund spoils, interdisciplinary modalities, and the pioneering spirit of the self-initiated.

By the Skin of Our Whims

Where else could you build a degree based on the skin of your whims? Where else could you demonstrate the value of your education was not clocked to your classroom hours but to the more expansive view of independent study. Not learning for its own sake, but for putting it to work — the fruits of your Hampshire labors.

The culmination of this remains the Division III — a thesis-like concentration anchored by academically-chaired committees and assembled by …

the Hampshire student as both messenger and focus of their purgatorial scrutiny.

Hampsters in contemporary habitats.

The committee assessed the merit of the proposed Div III contract against the abstracts of the thesis. Often within the experience of delivering their realization through scientific, literary, musical, cinematic, and theatrical expression.

It’s fortunate for the college and our community that these yardsticks for graduating Hampshire remain in place 51 years later. It’s this blending of freedom, support, and guided trial that binds the real-world fortunes of alumns to their original and enduring premise for attending Hampshire. It’s true that the process still carries this dogmatic insistence:

1 Div III completion = one liberal arts degree

Perhaps that’s the price for being left in our post graduate bassinets at the entry ramp of the professional freeway? But at least the generosity inspired by these rites of passage allows us to host these spirited disagreements for another day.

Hit the Ground Solving

There were the four schools that bracketed Hampshire’s academic offerings across the liberal arts spectrum of its founding: Cognitive Communications, Humanities, Social Sciences, and Natural Sciences. The portfolio was reshuffled with the great re-imagining of Hampshire’s relevance and differentiation from other endowment-challenged small liberal arts colleges.

This urgency pares the precarious state of four evolving social problems with Hampshire’s own comeback from the abyss of the dim ‘Mim days of F18-S19. In practical terms this means that the first arrivals no longer dabble in Div I level flirtations. They jump into the furies of the current spasming century with both skidding feet, be it…

    • Confronting climate change,
    • Escorting white supremacy out the door, or
    • Defining truth in a post truth world.

Average White Male Band

The supremacy part of hitting-the-ground was especially apparent in reliving the grainy splendor of Hampshire Video. The only hue starker than the black and white test patterns was the white maleness of the crew and cast. At the time I think most of the Infinity crew considered themselves more as outcasts — even by Hampshire freak-flagging standards. But fast forward to today and it’s undeniable. That’s not a reason to pay an apology forward. What would today’s Hampshire students want or do with such a misdirected misgiving?

A more sincere gesture would be to mentor these new voices and encourage their own shaping and discovery. That we were afforded the same pathways is the institutional memory that bears preservation — not the memories themselves. I thought of that when I heard Lisa Napoli’s virtual presence of her eighties curation segment. Lisa was lamenting the loss of her Hampshire video legacy. I almost interrupted her virtual voice by challenging her familiar lament with actual evidence.

Recently I excavated a sketch where I cast Lisa in her future real-life role of reporter on the antics of Wind Shields. The interview concerns celebrity journalism and the fortunes of Brooke’s fictitious younger sister. In retrospect, the script is sophomoric. Like so many Infinity sketches, it deserves an obscure death. But at least I was trying to venture out of my hermetic maleness. And never had such inside baseball risen this close to the surface of my personal Infinity history.

Roger Mellen (S72) introduces John Bruner (F94) who guides us through a virtual tour of today’s Studio G.

Once and Future Infinity

My favorite 50th Anniversary ceremony was the Infinity & Beyond viewing and discussion of Hampshire Video. Full disclosure: I had no hand in the assembling of the program or curating of the artifacts. Yet I got scooped into the eighties reels like so many unwashed sweaters with their drying cycles set to a mod kitchen microwave:

    • Former spouses,
    • Long dried-up mod spills, and
    • Distant combustions of drug-induced creative angst.

All living in one throbbing continuum of a continuous metallic oxide salvage mission. What could be more legacy than that? A big pile of donations, that’s what!

Failing big windfalls of liquidity, John Bruner is the proud and capable keeper of the Infinity flame. The torch he carries was passed to him by the legend known as Gunther.* We learned from Bruner that it was John Gunther (F84) who executed the monk-like preservation of Studio G as a streaming channel on YouTube. **


* Also, thanks to John Gunther for looking the other way when those of us on security detail let interrupted the slumber of the editing suites in the early morning off-hours. As my Div III collaborator Andy Morris-Friedman (F80) attests: "Maybe you could crank out a 3 minute rock video within your 3 hour allotment. But not a feature-length documentary."

** As a second footnote, Bruner provided some homework to the time-rich and cash-strapped Infinity partisans. It's assigning times, places, collaborators, titles, etc. to the smoldering collection of orphan videos now stored in this YouTube-hosted vault. Please contact John for the QR scan you'll need to access.

Many alumns I remain pals with harbor a lost treasure buried in the metallic shadows of this vast, untamed archive. I look forward to providing the door, secret handshake, and instructions for crowdsourcing this reconnaissance mission.

Tom Giovan (78F) shared the insight that Infinity itself was always about the framing, the queuing, and the segues. He figured the folks who wanted their mugs to appear on Intran would emerge from the shadows as the weekly “programming” destination. It was the “glue” between segments that the Infidiots that anchored whatever submissions had gathered in the backlog. I can confirm from the era immediately proceeding Tom’s that the glue formed its own standalone destination, whether it was introducing the news, entertainment, or bastard of both.

Unwritten Histories

The existential flash point of Miriam Nelson’s ten interminable months as the school’s president may have been the shock to the system that we never got from prior leaders. Maybe her predecessor would sooner fall on his sword than his board to balance capital improvements with lagging enrollments and budget realities. In either narrative, “Mim” held the carving cleaver in the role of the grim reaper. In the overtures to her would-be suitors, she saw in Hampshire’s buildings, property, and infrastructure something that no graduate could envision or tolerate: the seeds of an extractive business.

Februry 2019 | Cole Science Center: The winter of our discontent and the seeds of our revival.

The collective rejection of this was on full display at this weekend’s celebrations. $10 million in federal rescue funds have yet to be touched. Plan B is in place and may not be needed. Is this Hampshire’s books we’re talking about? We’ve got the vision thing and the business side playing on the same team? Amazing!

Curiously, there were teary-eyed farewells to former President Jonathan Lash curated in the 2010s reel. Yet there were no postcards from the predatory aggression or student-led brush-back against the administration in the dim, grim Mim times. John Bruner explained this as so much footage trapped in so many phones that never found its way to an arching meta treatment of this epic and ultimately heroic battle.

Any alumn Netflix producers out there?

A vulture capitalism carve-out script awaits only your filming rights. Either way, the diffuse nature of digital artifact collecting is a major challenge to a technology that remembers singular images contained in a visual lock-box in the casing of a SONY videocassette.

Next Chapters

We all left campus with a pocketful of sounds, pictures, a crumpled enrollment packet, and the exuberance that comes with believing the is a vital force for social change in a world gone to shit on our watch.

    • Can Hampshire cure climate change?
      • No and sorry but wrong question.
    • Can we nudge it back to health?
      • Better question.

Patty and I will soon depart our unglamorous work lives as salaried people. We will exchange commutes and Tupperware with a surplus of time and experience and shower them on a Hampshire community that supports the future as a nurturing place. One supporting its inhabitants on the earnings of their humanity alone. A market at the service of its citizens. It starts with a generosity still scarce in these times of perceived loss and imposed transition. Tomorrow’s Hampshire is the nesting place.

No empty nests near the Johnson Library.

References: