Surprise!
The business model for search engines sorting fact from fiction has been a failure. We’ve misplaced our trust in algorithms that were never designed to deliver judgments, let alone weigh the complexities of source knowledge.
Why should digital investigations be any different? Nobody is in a rush to pay Google or Bing by the query. However, we do “pay” out in wasted time, unreliable sources, a lack of confidence in these questionable answers, and our very agency to inform the choices we present our research clients.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bfa5/6bfa528d06d50b8855b6a595ff0496925397837c" alt=""
Searching Out Loud takes the exchange between researchers and search engines out of one-way conversations and into the realm of detective work. The bullhorn-like proclamation of the book’s title suggests that sound search practices are neither a secret nor restricted to a hushed confession-like disclosures between petitioners and their technological priests.
Forming questions, matching patterns, unscrambling signals, weighing explanations, and questioning the assumptions they’re based on can create quite a commotion!
They pierce the silence of the screened-in user, opening the reader up to a more transparent, repeatable, interactive, and test-worthy way to let our clients, colleagues, and even adversaries into our discovery, vetting, and analytical process. Indeed, it’s that transparency that carries the investigator’s voice to a level of trustworthy: Not just an attentive listen, but a call for the informed actions of our case teams and stakeholders.